Cyberfriends: The help you're looking for is probably here.
Welcome to Ed's Pathology Notes, placed here originally for the convenience of medical students at my school. You need to check the accuracy of any information, from any source, against other credible sources. I cannot diagnose or treat over the web, I cannot comment on the health care you have already received, and these notes cannot substitute for your own doctor's care. I am good at helping people find resources and answers. If you need me, send me an E-mail at scalpel_blade@yahoo.com Your confidentiality is completely respected.
DoctorGeorge.com is a larger, full-time service.
There is also a fee site at
www.afraidtoask.com.
|
|
![]() If you have a Second Life account, please visit my teammates and me at the Medical Examiner's office. |
|
![]() |
With one of four large boxes of "Pathguy" replies. |
I'm still doing my best to answer
everybody.
Sometimes I get backlogged,
sometimes my E-mail crashes, and sometimes my
literature search software crashes. If you've not heard
from me in a week, post me again. I send my most
challenging questions to the medical student pathology
interest group, minus the name, but with your E-mail
where you can receive a reply.
Numbers in {curly braces} are from the magnificent Slice of Life videodisk. No medical student should be without access to this wonderful resource. Someday you may be able to access these pictures directly from this page.
Also:
KCUMB Pathology Club
Freely have you received, freely give. -- Matthew 10:8. My
site receives an enormous amount of traffic, and I'm
handling about 200 requests for information weekly, all
as a public service.
Pathology's modern founder,
Rudolf
Virchow M.D., left a legacy
of realism and social conscience for the discipline. I am
a mainstream Christian, a man of science, and a proponent of
common sense and common kindness. I am an outspoken enemy
of all the make-believe and bunk that interfere with
peoples' health, reasonable freedom, and happiness. I
talk and write straight, and without apology.
Throughout these notes, I am speaking only
for myself, and not for any employer, organization,
or associate.
Special thanks to my friend and colleague,
Charles Wheeler M.D.,
pathologist and former Kansas City mayor. Thanks also
to the real Patch
Adams M.D., who wrote me encouragement when we were both
beginning our unusual medical careers.
If you're a private individual who's
enjoyed this site, and want to say, "Thank you, Ed!", then
what I'd like best is a contribution to the Episcopalian home for
abandoned, neglected, and abused kids in Nevada:
My home page
Especially if you're looking for
information on a disease with a name
that you know, here are a couple of
great places for you to go right now
and use Medline, which will
allow you to find every relevant
current scientific publication.
You owe it to yourself to learn to
use this invaluable internet resource.
Not only will you find some information
immediately, but you'll have references
to journal articles that you can obtain
by interlibrary loan, plus the names of
the world's foremost experts and their
institutions.
Alternative (complementary) medicine has made real progress since my
generally-unfavorable 1983 review linked below. If you are
interested in complementary medicine, then I would urge you
to visit my new
Alternative Medicine page.
If you are looking for something on complementary
medicine, please go first to
the American
Association of Naturopathic Physicians.
And for your enjoyment... here are some of my old pathology
exams
for medical school undergraduates.
I cannot examine every claim that my correspondents
share with me. Sometimes the independent thinkers
prove to be correct, and paradigms shift as a result.
You also know that extraordinary claims require
extraordinary evidence. When a discovery proves to
square with the observable world, scientists make
reputations by confirming it, and corporations
are soon making profits from it. When a
decades-old claim by a "persecuted genius"
finds no acceptance from mainstream science,
it probably failed some basic experimental tests designed
to eliminate self-deception. If you ask me about
something like this, I will simply invite you to
do some tests yourself, perhaps as a high-school
science project. Who knows? Perhaps
it'll be you who makes the next great discovery!
Our world is full of people who have found peace, fulfillment, and friendship
by suspending their own reasoning and
simply accepting a single authority that seems wise and good.
I've learned that they leave the movements when, and only when, they
discover they have been maliciously deceived.
In the meantime, nothing that I can say or do will
convince such people that I am a decent human being. I no longer
answer my crank mail.
This site is my hobby, and I do not accept donations, though I appreciate those who have offered to help.
This page was last updated February 9, 2008.
During the thirteen years my site has been online, it's proved to be
one of the most popular of all internet sites for undergraduate
physician and allied-health education. It is so well-known
that I'm not worried about borrowers.
I never refuse requests from colleagues for permission to
adapt or duplicate it for their own courses... and many do.
So, fellow-teachers,
help yourselves. Don't sell it for a profit, don't use it for a bad purpose,
and at some time in your course, mention me as author and KCUMB as my institution. Drop me a note about
your successes. And special
thanks to everyone who's helped and encouraged me, and especially the
people at KCUMB
for making it possible, and my teaching assistants over the years.
Whatever you're looking for on the web, I hope you find it,
here or elsewhere. Health and friendship!
I am presently adding clickable links to
images in these notes. Let me know about good online
sources in addition to these:
MedEdPORTAL -- American Association of Medical Colleges. Primarily for medical school faculty.
Pathology Education Instructional Resource -- U. of Alabama; includes a digital library
Pathopic -- Swiss site; great resource for the truly hard-core
Syracuse -- pathology cases
Alabama's Interactive Pathology Lab
"Companion to Big Robbins" -- very little here yet
Alberta
Pathology Images --hard-core!
Alberta Tumor Photos -- and lots more. Highly recommended.
Bristol Biomedical
Image Archive
EMBBS Clinical
Photo Library
Chilean Image Bank -- General Pathology -- en Español
Chilean Image Bank -- Systemic Pathology -- en Español
Connecticut
Virtual Pathology Museum
Australian
Interactive Pathology Museum
Semmelweis U.,
Budapest -- enormous pathology photo collection
Iowa Skin
Pathology
Loyola
Dermatology
History of Medicine -- National Library of Medicine
KU
Pathology Home
Page -- friends of mine
The Medical Algorithms Project -- not so much pathology, but worth a visit
National Museum of Health & Medicine -- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Telmeds -- brilliant site by the medical students of Panama (Spanish language)
U of
Iowa Dermatology Images
U Wash
Cytogenetics Image Gallery
Urbana
Atlas of Pathology -- great site
Visible
Human Project at NLM
Karolinska Institutet -- pathology links
Johns Hopkins CPC's
U. of Virginia Case Studies
Oklahoma Teaching Cases
Indiana U. Teaching Cases
SUNY Histopathology
West Virginia Case of the Month
Upstate NY Cases -- works only on some browsers
Society for Ultrastructural Pathologi -- electron microscope cases
WebPath:
Internet Pathology
Laboratory -- great siteEd Lulo's Pathology Gallery
Bryan Lee's Pathology Museum
Dino Laporte: Pathology Museum
Tom Demark: Pathology Museum
Dan Hammoudi's Site
Claude Roofian's Site![]()
Medmark Pathology -- massive listing of pathology sites
Pathology Handout -- Korean student-generated site; I am pleased to permit their use of my cartoons
Estimating the Time of Death -- computer program right on a webpage
Pathology Field Guide -- recognizing anatomic lesions, no pictures
St.
Jude's Ranch for Children
I've spent time there and they are good. Write "Thanks
Ed" on your check.
PO Box 60100
Boulder City, NV 89006--0100
More of my notes
My medical students
Clinical
Queries -- PubMed from the National Institutes of Health.
Take your questions here first.
HealthWorld
Yahoo! Medline lists other sites that may work well for you
We comply with the
HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify
here.
Outline the scope of the introductory course in pathology and clinical pathology. Describe the announced criteria for passing, and the factors that will be considered in any narrative performance summary. Give the title or nickname of the course text or the last name of its first author.
Describe the scope of pathology as a discipline. Distinguish general, systemic, anatomic, and clinical pathology. Mention at least three things a pathologist does when he or she is not teaching medical students! Tell how to contact your pathology instructors.
Identify Rudolf Virchow as the founder of modern pathology. Explain briefly the idea that pathology deals with human beings from the molecular to the social levels, and mention at least one health problem "caused by politicians".
Explain why we call our approach to pathology "scientific", and why we believe that we are telling you the truth. Distinguish various levels of scientific statements ("theory", "hypothesis", etc.) Answer common criticisms of pathology education made by non-physicians. Mention and justify at least one criterion for evaluating a media health claim.
Define iatrogenic disease, mention the extent of the problem, give at least two examples, and explain why some iatrogenic disease is acceptable. Comment on the application of Hippocrates' dictum, "First Do No Harm" to today's medical practice.
Mention how we screen for color-blindness, and tell what a color-blind student should do in lab.
INTRODUCTION
Where there is love of medicine, there is love of humankind.
Test all things; hold fast to what is good.
Pathology is the scientific study of disease. Disease could
reasonably be defined as internal problems that cause
pain and/or interfere with a person's ability to work, play, and/or love others.
Injuries (mechanical, chemical, electrical, or thermal), poisonings, and bad habits may or may not be
included in someone's definition of disease.
The social pathology that leads to disease is often listed among a patient's problems. Dr. Virchow,
the founder of modern pathology, considered it a principal mechanism of disease, though it falls
outside the domains of anatomic and clinical pathology.
There are several thousand distinguishable diseases. Generally, we will not tell you in this course
about diseases that affect fewer than 1 in 20,000 people during their lifetimes.
Doctors talk about disease and other human tragedy without showing obvious emotion. We are
sometimes asked how we can do this. Knowing the truth about our problems is essential before we
can do much about them.
INEVITABLE, SERIOUS DISEASES: Everyone who lives long enough will probably get:
Atherosclerosis: an accumulation of cholesterol and debris in cells of the intimal layer of the large
arteries, eventually ruining the artery. Some atherosclerosis is inevitable.
Alzheimer's changes: the anatomic lesions of Alzheimer's appear
in the brains of most, probably all, elderly people. Symptomatic Alzheimer's
may or may not be inevitable.
Osteoarthritis: irreversible wear-and-tear and age-related changes in joints.
Osteoporosis: irreversible loss of the substance of bones
Senile macular degeneration: Central blindness due to old age
Senile cataract: Opacification of the lens due to old age
OUR VERY COMMON, SERIOUS DISEASES
Atherosclerosis remains our most ubiquitous health problem. It kills a majority of US citizens. The
epidemic peaked in 1968, and atherosclerosis will soon be second to cancer as a killer of Americans.
Atherosclerosis begins during the first year of life.
Severe atherosclerosis causes transient ischemic attacks, strokes, angina pectoris, heart attacks,
ruptured aortic aneurysms, leg claudication, bowel ischemia, kidney destruction (by
"atheroembolization") and gangrene of the legs.
Whether atherosclerotic plaques in humans can be made to go away is a subject of debate today. In
the animal models, it is largely reversible. I predict that
during the next few years, cardiologists will focus on "vulnerable plaque"
(i.e., the lipid-rich areas that actually cause most of the trouble)
and discover that it often shrivels to nothing when coronary risk factors
are eliminated.
Cancers ("malignant neoplasms") are groups of cells that grow as if they were a new organ, invade
and destroy normal tissue, and spread to remote sites by the bloodstream or lymph vessels.
These develop in approximately 35% of US citizens (1,334,100 new cases this year, 556,500
deaths).
The higher incidence in men is mostly explained by more incidental prostate cancers. The higher
mortality in men is mostly explained by men having been smoking longer.
The commonest cancers in male humans (#'s: 2003)
(1) Prostate cancers (220,900 new cases this year;
28,900 deaths; lung cancer used to be more common,and plus prostate cancer
is being diagnosed much sooner)
(2) Lung cancers (91,800 new cases this year;
total rate is declining!; 88,400 deaths, obviously as lethal as ever)
(3) Colon-rectum cancers (72,800 new cases this year, 28,500 deaths)
(4) Bladder cancers (42,200 new cases this year; 8600 deaths)
(5) Lymphomas and myeloma (40,100 new cases this year; 17,500 deaths)
(6) Melanomas (29,900 new cases this year; 4700 deaths)
(7) # Kidney cancers (19,500 new cases this year; 7400 deaths)
(8) Oropharynx cancers (18,200 new cases this year, 4800 deaths, going down)
(9) # Leukemias (17,900 new cases this year; 12,100 deaths)
(10) Pancreas cancers (14,900 new cases this year; 14,700 deaths; very lethal cancer);
(11) Stomach cancers (13,400 new cases this year; 7000 deaths)
(12) Liver and biliary cancers (14,800 new cases this year; 10,500 deaths)
(13) Esophagus cancers (10,600 new cases this year; 9900 deaths; very lethal cancer)
(14) # CNS cancers (10,200 new cases this year; 7300 deaths)
(15) Larynx cancers (7100 new cases this year,
thankfully declining; 3000 deaths)
The commonest cancers in female humans:
(1) Breast cancers (211,300 new cases this year; 39,800 deaths; the rate probably is stable, while the
death rate is declining significantly)
(2) Lung cancers (80,100 new cases this year,
will soon catch up with the men; 68,800 deaths, making it the
#1 cancer killer of women by a solid margin)
(3) Colon-rectum cancers (74,700 new cases this year; 28,800 deaths)
(4) Endometrium cancers (40,100 new cases this year; 6800 deaths)
(5) Lymphomas and myelomas (35,500 new cases this year; 17,360 deaths)
(6) Ovary cancers (25,400 new cases this year; 14,300 deaths)
(7) Melanomas (24,300 new cases this year; 2900 deaths)
(8) Bladder cancers (15,200 new cases this year; 3900 deaths)
(9) Pancreas cancers (15,800 new cases this year; 15,300 deaths;
very lethal cancer)
(10) Thyroid cancers (16,300 new cases this year; 800 deaths)
(11) # Leukemias (12,700 new cases this year; 9800 deaths)
(12) Uterine cervix cancers (12,200 new cases this year, 4100 deaths; despite low U.S. rates, this is
the great cancer killer of young women worldwide)
(13) # Kidney cancers (12,400 new cases this year; 4500 deaths)
(14) Oropharynx cancers (9500 new cases this year; 2400 deaths)
(15) Stomach cancers (9000 new cases this year; 5100 deaths)
(16) # CNS cancers (8100 new cases this year; 5800 deaths)
"#" designates categories that contain a large number of pediatric patients.
NOTE: Small skin cancers that are easily cured are not included. These categories include cancers
of all degrees of aggressiveness that arise in a particular organ. For example, the common lung
cancers are still nearly 100% fatal, but some cancers that arise in the lungs are slow-growing, and
intercurrent disease can kill these patients.
High blood pressure ("hypertension") means increased systemic systolic and/or diastolic pressure.
High blood pressure eventually affects 15% of US citizens. The causes may be apparent but are
usually mysterious.
Complications of most forms of high blood pressure include accelerated atherosclerosis, strokes,
heart pump failure, brain malfunction, and kidney damage.
Not everyone with occasional elevated blood pressure readings is sick. The significance of such
"labile hypertension" remains unclear.
Emphysema (loss of the elasticity in the lung air spaces) and chronic bronchitis (longstanding
inflammation of the larger airways) are very troublesome.
These are very common, and are to be expected in
cigaret Diabetes mellitus means lack of insulin or resistance to its actions.
Maybe 5% of US citizens eventually get some form of diabetes. Today, its most serious
consequences are damage to the arteries, arterioles, eyes, kidneys, and nerves.
Bacterial pneumonias are infections within the alveoli of the lungs.
These often affect people with underlying physical problems. Bacterial pneumonia is a common
mechanism of death in these people.
Aspiration pneumonias result from getting something bad (especially stomach contents) into the
airways.
This is a very common mechanism of death in people with underlying physical or substance-abuse
problems.
Actually most bacterial pneumonias are the results of aspiration of micro-organisms from the mouth.
Tuberculosis: a special bacterial pneumonia that was once a major killer of healthy young people.
TB infection is still common, but serious disease is controllable.
Deep vein thrombosis: a blood clot in the deep veins, usually of a leg.
This is a minor problem by itself, but if the clot breaks off, it can cause sudden death by
traveling to
the pulmonary arterial tree. When this happens, it is called a pulmonary thromboembolus ("blood
clot in the lung").
Child abuse and neglect
This has always been widespread, but it has only recently been recognized as important. Although it
is reported much more often today, I know of no reason to believe that its prevalence in the US is
increasing.
Psychoneuroses
Anxiety, depression, agoraphobia, panic attacks,
and related phenomena that appear to result (at least in part) from
one's experiences rather than from well-defined organic changes. The basic ability to test reality is
preserved.
Somewhere between 10% and 70% of US citizens are impaired by psychoneuroses on any given
day.
Emotional overlay ("the supratentorial component") is important in most serious illness.
Alcoholism: loss of self-control in drinking ethyl alcohol.
Around 10% of US citizens ultimately become alcoholics. This is harmful to them and to their
families, employers, and other associates.
If you feel a compulsion to drink, or cannot stop after one drink,
then you must stop for the rest of your life. If you don't care about
yourself, then at least do this for the sake of those around you.
Around one US citizen in three presently has a serious personal problem because of an alcoholic.
Nicotine addiction
This is the principal risk factor for:
lung cancer
Combined with alcoholism, it is the principal risk factor for:
mouth and throat cancer
It is an important risk factor for:
atherosclerosis/sudden cardiac death
Today, most new nicotine addicts are adolescents. Cigaret smoking, once macho, is now a teenaged
girl's vice.
NOTE: Human beings are selectively fearful. Consider smokers
who won't try a single parachute jump "because you can get killed"....
Osteoporosis
This disables many older people, especially older women. It can produce chronic pain, collapsed
vertebral bodies, fractured hips, etc., etc.
Osteoarthritis
This causes pain and interferes with movement.
Alzheimer's disease
This eventually results in profound loss of mental function.
Alzheimer's disease includes "senility". Around 15% of US citizens have it when they die.
HIV virus infection (AIDS virus infection)
Iatrogenic disease
OUR VERY COMMON, USUALLY LESS SERIOUS DISEASES (NON-DISEASES, ETC.):
Each of these affects 5% or more of US citizens at risk sometime during their lives. Some can be
fatal, others are only trivial.
Bacterial diseases
boils
Viral, chlamydial viral upper respiratory infections
Fungal, protozoal, and parasitic diseases
tinea ("athlete's foot", "crotch rot", "ringworm", etc.)
Men's stuff
adolescent gynecomastia
Women's stuff
fibrocystic diseases of the breast
Skin diseases
Circulatory system
floppy mitral valve ("Barlow's syndrome")
Digestive diseases dental caries ("cavities")
Allergic diseases
food allergies (milk, eggs, peanuts, sesame, wheat, fish, shellfish, etc.)
Above the neck
functional headaches (muscle spasm, migraine, cluster)
Musculoskeletal problems
low back pain
Nutritional problems
obesity
Burns
Despite all this, today's North Americans and Northern Europeans (no, not the Himalayan Hunza
people; that's a cynical lie) are the healthiest people ever.
WORLD HEALTH
All the diseases listed so far are common all over the world.
Other diseases are very prevalent in some or all of the developing nations.
These are primarily political and economic problems rather than scientific mysteries.
Very common, could be controlled
Very common, less controllable:
Very common, less morbidity:
The governments of certain "developing" nations actively oppose efforts to control infectious
diseases among their poor. They know that these diseases are important in limiting population
growth.
During the last few years, the standing of the World Health Organization, a major branch of the
United Nations, has deteriorated greatly in the eyes of the medical world.
I think a lot of this criticism is misdirected, but the
facts are still discouraging. Despite some success
against particular infectious diseases, the World Health Organization is helpless to deal with the
kleptocratic politics of the poor nations, where governments want their people sick. Instead of
focusing on what it does best, it has taken refuge behind a facade of rhetoric ("Health is...." "Health
for all by the year 2000", etc.) and grandiose, useless programs. For the sickening facts, see Br.
Med. J. 309: 1425, 1491, 1566 & 1636, 1994 and 310: 110 & 178, 1995; Lancet 345: 203, 1995;
Lancet 351: 351, 743, 1998.
At least the money doesn't seem to be going into the kleptocrats' Swiss bank accounts, which is itself
quite an accomplishment.
Today, most health-sector activities in the poor nations are funded by
the World Bank, which has taken a hard-nosed attitude in the 1990's and
required reform (i.e., the government must adopt policies that encourage
free enterprise and a strong economy) and cooperation. See Lancet 351: 665, 1998.
WORDS FOR COMMON AND/OR TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASES: You need to know these
terms.
Epidemic: a disease that is widespread in a community of people. (It is often, but need not be, a
contagious disease).
Epizootic: an epidemic in a community of animals. (Pronounce it "EPP-ee-zoe-WOTT-ick".)
Pandemic: a worldwide epidemic.
Endemic: a never-ending epidemic.
Infectious disease: one caused (or assumed to be caused) by micro-organisms (the infectious agents)
that can be transmitted from creature to creature.
Zoonosis: an infectious disease that people usually acquire from sick animals rather than from other
people.
Vector: an organism, usually an insect, that carries an infectious disease from person to person, etc.
Carrier: a person who harbors the infectious agents but has no symptoms.
Reservoir: the place (usually animals or carriers) where an infectious agent lives between epidemics.
HOW COMMON IS A DISEASE?
First, you must define the disease and the population.
Criteria for making the diagnosis of a disease are generally established by pathologists. The autopsy
is still ultimate proof of the presence or absence of most diseases.
The population may be all the people in Kansas City, all the pregnant women in Missouri, all the US
citizens currently living in Tokyo, all the scleroderma patients attending a certain clinic, etc.
Incidence: the number of new cases during a period of time (generally new cases per
100,000 population per year)
Prevalence: the total number of cases during a period of time (generally cases per
100,000 population)
Obviously, incidence equals prevalence divided by average duration.
OUR FATAL DISEASES YESTERDAY
Our ancestors died of bacterial diseases, smallpox The common bacterial infections caused the majority of deaths, young and old people.
Pneumococcal pneumonia was such a common killer of the elderly that it was called "the old man's
friend". It did not spare the young, either. Dr. William Osler called the pneumococcus "captain of
the men of death". Today penicillin ("the old man's enemy") cures all but neglected cases.
Other gram-positive cocci (staphylococcus Tuberculosis ("the white plague") killed 1 person in 5. Today almost all cases are curable using
drugs.
Syphilis Bubonic plague Typhus
Infantile diarrhea is usually a bacterial disease. It is still a major world-wide killer. All these babies
could be saved were it not for political, social, and economic problems.
Influenza Yellow fever (caused by a virus) and malaria (caused by a protozoan) were two very important,
mosquito-borne killers.
Smallpox, caused by a virus, was the leading cause of death in many countries until vaccination
made it preventable.
Most people in the US are immunized: against these diseases, which would otherwise be common:
Diphtheria
Several relatively common, noninfectious, non-cancerous diseases that were once often fatal but are
now usually cured by surgery.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms
Without high technology, these would all be important killers once again. (The only exception is
smallpox, which seems to be extinct, but could well reappear as a biological
weapon.)
OUR FATAL DISEASES TODAY
What kills the two million people who die yearly in the US?
Atherosclerosis
Myocardial infarction ("heart attack") and sudden cardiac death
(These together cause 600,000 deaths per year.)
Stroke (200,000 deaths per year)
Ruptured aortic aneurysm (less common)
(These figures include diabetics, because most diabetics die of atherosclerosis.)
Risk factors for atherosclerosis are:
(1) Elevated serum cholesterol (by far the most important)
Cancer (over half a million deaths in the US each year)
Any cancer, untreated, will eventually kill the patient.
Approximately 25% of US citizens die of cancer
Slightly more men than women die, since breast cancers are often cured.
See the earlier section on common serious diseases for information about various cancers.
Remember lung cancer is now the commonest cancer killer of both men and women. ("You've come
a long way, Baby.")
Emphysema and chronic bronchitis (150,000 deaths per year)
Cigaret smoking causes the overwhelming majority of fatal cases.
High blood pressure and heart pump failure (100,000 deaths per year)
High blood pressure promotes atherosclerosis and kidney disease, but it can also kill by causing
heart pump failure.
Heart pump failure ("congestive heart failure") may also be due to disease of the valves, anatomical
defects, amyloidosis, drugs, virus infections, and so forth.
Alcoholism is the other leading cause of "natural" (?!) death:
Cirrhosis of the liver (70,000 deaths per year from this alone; in the US, alcohol is the usual cause.)
Alcohol is also involved in a majority of homicides, suicides, and accidents.
Pulmonary thromboembolus is primary cause of 50,000 deaths a year. (The source is usually a leg
vein, sometimes a pelvic vein.)
Many more patients with serious underlying diseases die with these travelling thrombi as the final
mechanism.
Kidney disease (35,000 deaths a year)
Common fatal kidney diseases include chronic glomerulonephritis, chronic interstitial nephritis
("pyelonephritis"), and adult polycystic kidney disease.
Diabetes mellitus, amyloidosis, systemic lupus, and bad high blood pressure are other common
causes of end-stage kidney disease.
Alzheimer's disease (including "senility") causes many deaths, usually through bacterial-aspiration
pneumonia.
Bacterial and aspiration pneumonias are common final mechanisms of death in many debilitating
diseases.
Today, the pneumonias seldom kill a previously-healthy young person.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
In some communities, AIDS remains a leading cause of death.
Unnatural deaths:
Homicides (around 30,000 per year)
Suicides (true number unknown, estimates give it around 50,000 per year)
"Accidents" (around 100,000 per year)
When pathologists speak of the manner of death, we mean "natural",
"homicide", "suicide", or
"accidental". We may also conclude, after autopsy, that the manner of death is "undetermined".
Iatrogenic disease is disease caused by medical diagnosis and/or treatment. It is epidemic, though
deaths are usually listed under the patient's disease and often would have occurred anyway. (Classical
scholars call it "iatrogenous disease"....) For the disturbing Harvard study, see NEJM 324: 307 &
377, 1991.
What kills young people in the US?
"Before birth":
An unknown percentage (at least 31%, maybe more -- NEJM 319: 189, 1988) of fertilized eggs fail
to implant or are lost before pregnancy is recognized.
Around 1 out of every 6 known implantations is followed by spontaneous miscarriage.
There are around 1.5 million legal abortions performed in the US yearly. (Contrast this to large
areas where both contraception and abortion are illegal, and where illegal abortion is the leading
cause of death in women aged 15-39: Br. Med. J. 300: 1705, 1990.)
You will have to decide for yourself what all this means.
Under one year: Prematurity and birth defects
Around 1.3% of US newborns die from these causes. This is pretty good; only a few nations with
fewer % poor do better.
Mysterious "sudden infant death syndrome" kills around 0.5% of infants during the first year of life.
See below. Ages 1-19:
Males:
(1) "Accidents" (around 8000 / year)
(2) Homicide (around 2500 / year)
(Homicide is extremely common in the age 10-20 range in certain U.S. communities; JAMA
267: 2905, 1992)
(3) Suicide (around 1700/year)
(4) Cancer (around 1200/year)
Females:
(1) "Accidents" (around 4000 / year)
(2) Cancer (around 1000 / year)
(3) Homicide (around 700 / year, double the suicide rate)
Child abuse and neglect causes some deaths among children. The true prevalence is unknown and is
controversial -- at least some are overlooked ("accidents" or "sudden infant death syndrome").
Likewise, the incidence of infanticide in the developing nations is unknown, but is probably high.
(1) Accidents (around 20,000 / year)
(2) Suicide (around 9000 / year)
(3) Homicide (around 8000 / year)
(4) Heart disease, followed closely by cancer and then HIV infection
(2) Cancer (Around 6000 / year)
(3) Heart disease (around 2800 / year)
(4) Suicide, followed closely by homicide and HIV infection
Natural death in young athletes:
The average American's chances of being killed by (Nature 367: 39, 1994):
motor vehicle accident...
1 in 100
Today's deadly diseases in the US are largely lifestyle-related. (This is one factor that contributes to
physicians' dissatisfaction with their work!)
Alcohol abuse and nicotine addiction are grave public health problems. Use of certain of the illegal
drugs (amphetamine, cocaine, heroin, phencyclidine, others) is clearly harmful.
Contrary to what you have been told by doctor-bashers, the prevalence of alcoholism and drug
addiction among physicians is substantially lower than among their non-physician peers. However,
doctors do have an unfortunate tendency to prescribe mind-altering substances for themselves. Don't
do this. See JAMA 267: 2333, 1992.
Sexual promiscuity (homosexual, heterosexual) causes many health problems.
Obesity and lack of exercise probably contribute to ill-health.
Americans tend to eat too much salt, saturated fat and cholesterol, too many calories, and
too
little
fiber. Sucrose (cane sugar) is bad for the teeth.
Sunlight is the principal cause of all three common skin cancers, as well as the cancer that arises
within the adult eye. (Sunlight also helps activate vitamin D, but vitamin D supplementation of
food has apparently eliminated our need for sunlight.)
Some food additives that make some people sick are tartrazine yellow (dye), monosodium glutamate
("Chinese restaurant syndrome"), wasabi (horseradish served with sushi, the "Japanese restaurant
syndrome"), and sulfites ("salad-bar asthma").
Despite the claims of "alternative medicine", the following are probably not significant health
problems. (Let us know if you have additional facts about these.)
INHERITED DISEASE AND BIRTH DEFECTS
Commonest serious Mendelian genetic diseases:
Many genetic syndromes are much more prevalent within particular ethnic groups. No race is
"superior". Here are a few to remember:
While we're here... I have often questioned the value of
declaring the person's race at the beginning of the
case presentation. I give my "race" as "human", and believe that everybody
else should, too. Compared with Euro-Americans,
Afro-Americans have substantially more
deaths due to high blood pressure, plasma cell myeloma, and
prostate cancer, and substantially fewer
deaths due to malignant melanoma; they also
have far less osteoporosis and testicular cancer.
The commonest catastrophic birth defects are neural tube defects (bad "spina bifida", etc.;
1/500 births) and cerebral palsy (maybe 1/400).
DREAD DISEASES OF YOUNG ADULTS:
Several common, chronic diseases that can be really bad and that begin during young adult life are
listed here, with their approximate prevalence among young adults.
"NEW DISEASES" (unknown, rare, or seldom recognized a few years ago):
"NON-DISEASES" (i.e., named entities that produce no morbidity or are beneficial)
Some of these might be considered minor cosmetic problems, or patients may actually like them.
EASY-TO-MISS DISEASES
Here's my list of easy-to-miss, easy-to-treat, deadly-if-untreated diseases.
DISEASES WE SKIP
In this course, we do not discuss certain functional medical problems (i.e., those that lack any
known anatomic correlate). However, it is obvious that physiologic defects are essential to
these processes.
Other important medical problems are largely mechanical and you will learn about these on your
rotations.
A few other important entities usually fall outside the domain of anatomic pathology:
Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, blocks (bundle branch, Winckebach's, Mobitz II, Stokes-Adams
attacks, etc.), channelopathies like Brugada's and long QT,
and a host of other cardiac conduction-rhythm problems are diseases for
electrocardiographers, not pathologists.
Transient ischemic attacks of the brain ("little strokes"), amaurosis fugax, and related phenomena
leave no anatomic traces.
The anaphylactic, vasovagal, and vagovagal varieties of shock can cause death with little or no
anatomic change. So can postural asphyxias ("swallowing the tongue", etc.)
The anatomic pathology of cerebral concussion is unknown.
RIGHT TREATMENT, WRONG REASON
"Science is self-correcting". In medical school, I was taught silly mechanisms ("nitrates dilate your
calcified coronary arteries!") for the following treatments, which actually work well but by a
different mechanism:
MORE WORDS ABOUT DISEASES
Symptoms: what the patient tells you, the physician.
Signs: what you, the physician, discover on physical exam and special studies, by yourself or with
help. Means the same as findings.
Lesion: any unit of abnormal anatomy (less often, abnormal chemistry or an abnormal molecule)
Morphology: the anatomic lesion(s)
Etiology: what causes the disease. A noun or nouns. If it's external, it's called the etiologic agent.
The etiology of many diseases is unknown.
Pathogenesis: how the etiologic agent causes the disease. A short story that usually includes
"many of the steps are presently unknown".
Pathognomonic: a sign or group of signs that occur in only one disease. Same as diagnostic (of).
Prognosis: how the patient can realistically expect to do.
Syndrome: A group of symptoms and/or signs that tend to run
together but may be caused by any of several diseases
THE GREATEST MISERY
Which diseases cause the most overall suffering and time lost from work prior to old age? It is
probably a near-tie:
MALE:FEMALE RATIOS
Many diseases clearly occur more often in one sex or the other.
The reasons for this are seldom known, but will probably be discovered. (For example,
pre-menopausal women are immune to South American blastomycosis because estrogens cause the
fungus to revert to hyphal form, which is easily killed by the body.)
These rules of thumb work most of the time:
Women are more likely to get any disease in which autoimmunity is believed to be an important
mechanism (except diseases linked to a particular class I HLA molecule, i.e., ankylosing spondylitis
and its family).
Women also are more prone to develop significant osteoporosis.
Men are more likely to get all the other diseases.
THE MOST INTERESTING DISEASES
This is a matter of opinion. You may decide the psychiatric disorders are the most interesting.
Especially intriguing are treatable organic diseases that affect the mind. Remember these before you
commit your patient to psychotherapy or a life in custodial care!
CULT DIAGNOSES ("imaginary diseases")
Multiple chemical sensitivities is seen almost exclusively in survivors
of real child abuse.
Strangely, most or all synthetic chemicals cause symptoms (but no objective
signs), exactly at the threshold at which the chemical can be smelled.
Natural chemicals do not have this effect.
The obvious conclusion is the correct one.
Tell such a person that an odor is synthetic (even carbon dioxide), and it will
produce symptoms. Victims typically try to force everyone around them not to
use cologne or deodorant, etc., etc. If a schoolchild is designated as "victim",
all the teachers and other kids are affected. And so forth.
The false memories syndrome ruined thousands of lives for the falsely-accused
before society finally wised up. Rather than learn new methods of coping
with adult life, emotionally-disturbed people were told instead that they
were horribly scarred by (probably-imaginary) forgotten sexual abuse and/or satanic
cult exposure and/or alien abduction. Again, the cult keeps people sick.
There are certain to be more cults like this in the future.
As physicians, you will discover that if you suggest to someone that
a particular symptom will develop, it will. This makes these
iatrogenic diseases.
TREATING DISEASE
We are healthy because of good food, good sanitation, adequate living space, public health
programs, and a good medical system for treating diseases and injuries. (It is hard to say which of
these is most important.)
Some diseases can be cured.
Examples include surgical diseases (localized cancers, appendicitis, hernias, gallstones, etc.), and
bacterial and parasitic diseases.
Surgery became practical with antisepsis in the later 1800's, while the antibiotics came into use in
the 1940's. Before this, the history of therapeutics was essentially the history of quackery and
iatrogenic disease.
Most other diseases are not curable, but can be treated.
Treatments that work well are generally simple once you understand the pathology. Treatments that
don't work well are generally quite elaborate. (One notable exception is chemotherapy for a few
cancers, principally those that occur in young people.)
Again, most effective treatments are of relatively recent origin.
Your patients may be self-conscious about disease that cannot be treated, and cannot be hidden.
Other people tend to shy away from the person who's visibly different.
Not for sissies, but the best, and easiest, ice-breaker when the problem cannot be hidden is for the
patient to draw attention to the problem. Decorate your wheelchair (movie, "Silver Bullet"). Put
plastic flowers on your crutches. "Do you like my birthmark [grin]? Feel how rough it is!" "Every
hair fell out of my body when I was only six!" "A bear did that to me [chuckle]." "I'm a hobbit."
Choose a nickname ("Folks call me 'Patch' / 'Spot' / 'Eraser Man'!")
The practice of medicine in the U.S. has become so corrupted by big-money and big-egos (plus an
occasional bit of sheer stupidity) that Americans now trust their lawyers more than their physicians,
particularly to explain all the options truthfully and to act according to their wishes (NEJM 330:
223, 1994).
I would like you to help change this back. I will give you the knowledge and the power to reason;
you need to find the integrity within yourselves.
The medical care that people receive in the US is high-quality but very expensive. Often the benefits
of treatment are obvious, often they are not. Our society has decided to make
it hardest for the working poor to obtain basic care, and rations
the care for those with access by "managed care". Expect this to change.
Health care costs total around 12% of our gross national product. Remember these equal health
care incomes. Physician's bills make up around 30% of this. In 1992, we spent $800,000,000,000
on health care.
The British health care system generates only half the costs (and half the incomes) of our health care
system. The British seem to be just as healthy as we are.
It is commonplace for the hospital bill for a profoundly brain-damaged premature baby to total
$100,000 or more. (By comparison, the amount spent to save each otter after the Exxon Valdez oil
spill was a mere $80,000: Science 254: 1596, 1991.)
The average cost to the family of a child who has died of leukemia (not counting the portion that
their insurance pays) is $38,000. (There are around 12,000 new cases of childhood leukemia per
year; around half of them get cured, the other half die.)
In mid-1986, the average AIDS victim lived 160 days with the disease, and died with medical bills
totalling $140,000. A lot has changed
since then,
but the cost of treating ten
American AIDS victims exceeds the total health care expenditures of several developing nations
with millions of sick people.
There are now 10,000 people in the United States in irreversible comas. There are many thousands
more with profound mental impairments or "locked in". (All these are unkindly called "vegetables";
"apallic" means no working cortex.) All would die quickly without continuous medical care, and
someone pays $130,000 per patient per year (Br. Med. J. 301: 1094, 1990).
Today, the usual cause of a well-to-do US family's being reduced to poverty is medical bills for the
care of one member.
Around 28 million US citizens have little access to primary health care because they have neither
insurance nor welfare.
One factor that makes health care more expensive in the US is large awards in medical malpractice
cases. The average award today is over one million dollars.
It is probably inevitable that any system of health care distribution will contain perverse incentives
(Sci. Am. 269(1): 24, July 1993) either to overtreat-overcharge (fee-for-service, defensive medicine)
or to undertreat (HMO's/managed care, British socialized medicine).
Disease can ruin the quality of life for a person. Most of us physicians find it hard not to treat
disease under any circumstances.
Managed care saved the health care system in the mid-1990's.
Managed death is next.
Most states now have a Natural Death Act, reflecting a world-wide movement. (Of course, you
don't stop treating all patients who say they want to die.) Right or wrong, by the time you are in
practice, active euthanasia, under some circumstances, will almost certainly be legal throughout
most, if not all, of the U.S.
Active euthanasia is already a fact of life in most countries (for example, Hastings Center Reports
22(6): 3, Nov.-Dec. 1992), though it remains illegal. French physicians
talk freely about euthanizing babies when there is profound neurological
damage (Lancet 355: 2112, 2000). The Dutch legalized active euthanasia
experience: Lancet 338: 669, 1991. Euthanasia was lately (1997) legal, with some controls, in
parts of
Australia (NEJM 334: 326, 1996). However, this was reversed on political pressure.
Oregon's
"Ballot Issue 16" succeeded in 1994 and was strongly supported by the Federal appeals court (i.e.,
the government has no reason to interfere with a terminally-sick person's desire to die comfortably;
this thinking would put active euthanasia on a par with legal abortion).
Colombia legalized it in 1997 (Br. Med. J. 3134: 1852, 1997),
the same month that the Supreme Court decided that physician-assisted suicide was not a
constitutional right, but that the states could
decide (Washington vs. Glicksberg,
Vacco vs. Quill). Oregon made it legal in 1997 (NEJM 340:
577, 1999), and it has had a major impact on terminal care, not so much
that assisted suicide is being carried out but that physicians
have educated themselves about things they can do instead (JAMA 285: 2363, 2001;
JAMA 288: 91, 2002 is a good "what to do when..." article).
The reason people choose it is mostly out of fear
of losing autonomy and/or bowel/bladder control (NEJM 342: 598, 2000).
There has been no "slippery slope" either in Oregon or the Netherlands
(NEJM 356: 1911, 2007).
Suicide and assisting suicide for an altruistic motive have always
been legal in modern Switzerland, and the Swiss will probably soon
legalize active euthanasia (Br. Med. J. 321: 271, 2003).
Active euthanasia used to bother me some. However, it is now pretty clear that
a solid majority of the American public wants to allow active euthanasia in certain incurable-disease
situations: (NEJM 326: 197, 1992; JAMA 267: 2658, 1992; according to the JAMA, several
mostly-pro-life demographic segments that one would expect to oppose the idea actually support it
strongly). In 1992, a state referendum (Washington Initiative 119) failed; exit polls showed it failed
only because voters thought the particular ballot proposal lacked sufficient controls.
Both the physicians and the
public in Jack Kevorkian's Michigan seem to strongly prefer legalization over an explicit ban
(NEJM 304: 303, 1996). The British overwhelmingly
favor active euthanasia in cases of intractable suffering and useless life: Br. Med. J. 305: 728, 1992.
Even the British Medical Journal, not noted for its radical editorials, called Jack Kevorkian a
"hero": Br. Med. J. 312: 1431, 1996.
The Netherlands experience, and a little number juggling for the US,
indicates that physician-assisted suicide won't be a huge money-saver
for the public (NEJM 339: 167, 1998) -- implicit is the
reassurance that it won't do major harm to health care incomes.
More from the Netherlands: NEJM 342: 551, 2000.
Mount Sinai euthanasia survey: NEJM 338:1193, 1998.
According to this anonymous poll, it's not as widespread
in the US as you might think. Only about 10% of oncologists say
they have performed physician-assisted suicide (Ann. Int. Med. 133: 527, 2000)
New definitions of death will focus on permanent loss of higher cortical functions and allow a
physician to pronounce a patient dead while the heart is beating (Hast. Cent. Rep. 23(4): 18, 1993; I
said years ago this would happen as the need for health care rationing became obvious).
In the 1990's, the AMA became willing to publish neutral articles on what a physician should do if
asked for active euthanasia (accompanied, of course, by reaffirmations of its opposition to active
euthanasia; JAMA 270: 870, 874 & 875, 1993). The New England Journal also
dropped the anti-euthanasia taboo: NEJM 334: 1374, 1996.
Things continue to progress toward managed death, as I predicted.
In the Netherlands, about half of requests for euthanasia
(which of course must still be reviewed) end in euthanasia;
about half of the remaining patients die before it can be carried
out, and the rest are evenly divided between doctors refusing and
patients changing their minds (Arch. Int. Med. 165: 1698, 2005).
A Dutch patient desiring to end the suffering can now choose between
active euthanasia and "terminal sedation" (i.e., drugs to induce unconsciousness
while dehydration does its work); choice is based on beliefs and
desire for "dignity" (Arch. Int. Med. 166: 749, 2006).
The latter choice is legal in the US and called "palliative sedation";
it's now widespread (JAMA 294: 1810, 2005).
Israel now formally recognizes "physician-assisted dying" as consistent
with civil law and halakah
(background and protests from some ethicists: J. Med. Ethics 30: 353, 2004;
it's now in practice: Heart & Lung 35: 412, 2006).
Most of the major articles being written now (2007) focus on children.
Were I to request active or passive euthanasia, or end my life to escape the ravages of disease or
injury (any of which I might at some time do), I would want at least some of the money that would
have been spent on my care to go to help poor children who would otherwise not have a chance in
life. I suspect that most decent people think similarly, and a few physicians are finally finding the
courage to say as much in public (South Afr Med. J. (!): 82: 35, 1992).
Today's medicine causes health problems. Much of this is unavoidable, and is even expected.
Iatrogenic ("doctor-caused") problems include:
In considering today's epidemic of iatrogenic disease, we must remember that all the writings of
Hippocrates ("First Do No Harm") do not contain a single remedy specific for a particular disease.
It is a fact that patients almost always misrepresent what has happened between them and any
physician. (For example, I have never heard a physician tell a patient how long he or she would
live.) Remember this when you take patient histories, and when you hear "testimonials" (good or
bad).
UNCONVENTIONAL TREATMENTS
Many sick people seek treatment from outside the hated "medical establishment". They may choose
from a wide range of unconventional healers.
Many people claim that they have been healed by unconventional means. You will have to form
your own opinion about each case.
Rheumatoid arthritis, regional enteritis, multiple sclerosis, and warts often seem to respond
remarkably well to spiritual healing. I know no naturalistic explanation for these cases, though
there might be one, and there are no "placebo-controlled studies".
If you investigate other cases thoroughly, you will most often discover that the patient never had the
disease, or was cured by conventional means, or had a self-limited disease, or still has the disease.
Denial of illness is characteristic of many sick people. Remember also that some people are under
great pressure to say they have been healed "spiritually". Many people still believe that serious
disease is a punishment for extraordinary sinfulness (their own, their parents').
As a lawyer, Ms. Rodham-Clinton wrote a brief arguing that the state could force parents who
believed their child's cleft palate was "God's punishment" to have it fixed anyway. The Republicans
(convention, 1992) cited this as proof she was "anti-family".
When you read articles pointing out that sick people who attend church
seem to do better than those who don't, bear in mind that those attending
church are perhaps not so sick and/or have a better support system.
Most clergy are happy to work with physicians, and a spirit of mutual respect usually prevails.
Two references on "commercial" (?) faith-healing:
Dr. William Nolen's Healing: A Doctor in Search of a Miracle, 1974. Dr. Nolen, a Christian,
personally investigated Katheryn Kuhlmann, occultist Norbu Chen, and the Filipino psychic
surgeons. Dr. Nolen saw no evidence of any miracles. All but Kuhlmann were blatant and
shameless frauds.
Professional stage magician James Randi's personal investigation of TV faith-healers appears in The
Faith Healers, Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1987. Mr. Randi describes many fraudulent practices.
(For me, the most damning of all the observations is that the "televangelists" never approach or
televise the members of the audience that are truly and visibly sick -- multiple sclerosis, cerebral
palsy, visible tumors, obvious deformities, etc.)
People in the US spend over ten billion dollars per year on the unproven remedies of alternative
medicine. This is several times greater than the total spent on medical research.
Almost without exception, health-care providers who say they use alternative techniques have never
tested their methods by honest, controlled experiments. Instead, they have six standard excuses.
(1) "Our methods are harmless and pleasant."
(2) "Our methods are less expensive than the AMA's."
(3) "Our methods are spiritual and/or cannot be explained."
(4) "We will never treat individual 'whole persons' as statistics."
(5) "The methods of science are invalid (Einstein's relativity, Heisenberg's uncertainty,
'Postmodernism', etc.)"
(6) "We don't have any money for research." (!?!)
Alternative practitioners make a great show of loving their patients. They are also much more likely
than faith-healers to attack the characters, motives, and skill of honest physicians.
NOTE: In 1986, the average yearly income for a chiropractor, after taxes and expenses, was
$116,000.
Attacks on genuine science come from both the screwball right and the screwball left, and are
hallmarks of both. Now that the left-wing social agenda (i.e., massive government redistribution of
wealth and opportunity) is overwhelmingly unpopular around the world, left-wing nuts in
"academia" have little to do except bad-mouth science, which nobody understands anyway. For
example, in 1995, the $5.3 million dollar Smithsonian "Science in American Life" exhibit omitted
all reference to the space program and the transistor in favor of an emphasis on underrepresentation
of women and minorities in science, and how research is often driven by the
corporate profit motive instead of pure altruism
(Nature 374: 207, 1995; and you thought Marxist ideology was dead?) A real scientist on
the project complains about domination of the whole project by left-wing "social scientists and
pseudoscientists who had no idea how science really works."
Evidence that spiritual healing or alternative remedies are ever effective remains anecdotal.
But right or wrong, spiritual healers and alternative medical practitioners have a tremendous impact
on your patients' perceptions of disease and medical doctors.
In particular, be aware that some of your most helpless patients will have their therapeutic and pain
medications withheld by families who have bought into "spiritual" ("Christian" or "New Age") or
"alternative healing".
As of this writing, the Office of Alternative Medicine (now the National
Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine),
established at the NIH for political reasons,
isn't inspiring much confidence (Sci. Am. 269(3): 39, Sept. 1993; JAMA 280: 1553, 1998)
HOLISTIC MEDICINE
Classical pathology describes discrete diseases and this enables us to treat patients effectively. There
actually are different diseases that are best treated by different methods.
Offering a simple-minded explanation and a "safe natural treatment" for the "whole" of disease (or
to strengthen the "whole" patient) are standard ploys of the medical quack.
So is the meaningless charge that "AMA doctors don't understand health".
Do not confuse the slogans of quackery with the methods all physicians use to understand and help
their patients as people.
The relationship between "stress" and disease remains poorly understood. (All about stress: JAMA
267: 1244, 1992, for physiologists).
In many animal models, stress seems to help cause specific diseases, but in many others, it seems to
help prevent specific diseases.
All the serious recent work I could find has utterly failed to confirm the once-fashionable claims that
certain "stressful life-events"
tend to precede the appearance or recurrence of clinical diseases
apart from the psychiatric syndromes.
For
example, see
J. Inf. Dis. 178S1:S67, 1998 (zoster You may hear that people unconsciously choose particular diseases to "symbolize their emotional
conflicts". Patients are blamed for being sick because they have unhealthy attitudes. In some circles
(both "liberal-holistic" and "conservative-spiritual"), people scapegoat the sick. This is cruel, and it
is also groundless (NEJM 312: 1570, 1985).
Be aware of the ways in which lifestyle affects disease, and the effect of the disease and its treatment
on the "whole patient" and his or her associates. But be realistic.
Your patient has other problems besides the disease. It may help if you know what these are, but
there is seldom much you can do about them.
You may run into "religious conservatives" who contend that unusual sickness means unusual
wickedness, and "if you were really sorry for your sin, you would walk out healed", etc. It's hard to
argue with these folks, but I'm not aware of any reason to think this is true. And following Job, I
prefer incomplete answers to the obviously-wrong answers of uncharitable ignorance. See also
Luke, "If a tower falls on you and kills you, does that mean you were more wicked than the next
person?" "No."
A school of pop psychology (popular with both left-wingers and
right-wingers, it seems to have peaked
in the late 1980's, but is still with us) emphasizes "everyone is an addict of some kind and is either in
recovery or in denial", "you cannot begin to solve the problems of others until you have solved your
own", and "the process of recovery is never finished". Only an ideologue would consider these to be
better than half-truths.
No reasonable person would deny the importance of lifestyle in several common diseases, and the
importance of attitude and participation in some situations faced by sick people. But be aware that
many of your patients who have non-lifestyle-related diseases are being told they are "responsible",
"have bad attitudes", etc., etc.
I note with some satisfaction an increasing use of the compound word "self-empowerment" by
today's trendoids. As far as I can tell, it means, "Quit sobbing, shut up, wise up, act smart, and make
a life for yourself." Watch for even more of this, especially in view of diminishing public's
indulgence for (and tolerance of) do-nothings and crybabies.
Patients like to have the physician explain their diseases and procedures to them. They also like
being given something to do to help in their treatment. They like to be treated courteously, and most
of them like to be touched. If a physician does these things, patients will usually be satisfied with
the overall care they have received.
Catch-phrases of the "political correctness" movement (which peaked in the early 1990's) include
"different abilities / differently-abled" for handicaps, and "challenged" instead of "sick".
This led to some Alice-in-Wonderland litigation; for example, in some jurisdictions you cannot
consider that being in a wheelchair is a worse outcome than being able to walk, because being in a
wheelchair is "differently abled". I'd like to meet the left-wing nut, confined to a wheelchair because
of a physician's error, who forgoes suing for damages, since he or she is now "differently abled".
Likewise, "challenges" are issued to winners, not to losers. (Even immunologic "challenges" are
administered to creatures known to have fought off infection before.) I cannot regard simply getting
sick, especially from some unhealthy and unwholesome practice, as making somebody a winner.
A word-search in 1993 showed these terms to be common in the allied-health literature, but non-existent in writings intended
for physicians.
The Americans with Disabilities Act has made a level playing-field
for companies wishing to hire the handicapped. It has also led to
some bizarre law. There
are some the-sky's-the-limit entitlements.
And it only applies to disabled people.
For example, if you have cystic fibrosis (a real disability) but
can do a particular job, they cannot fire you for it,
and have to make reasonable accommodations if you want to apply
for the job. However, if you
are fired by some moron
for carrying the gene (this has happened), you have
no legal recourse, and your rights have not been violated,
because you are not disabled.
Today, "medical ethics" is a growth industry that pays extremely well (i.e., protection from
lawsuits; Pediatrics 93: 310, 1994).
It was also obvious to this writer, when he was in training, that opposition by other physicians to
discontinuing heroic therapy was motivated, at least in part, by economic incentives. (Yeah, there
will never be a health-care reimbursement system without perverse incentives.) Remember this the
next time somebody's "awful ethical dilemma" seems incredibly silly.
Today's ethicists talk about "futility"
(JAMA 281: 937, 1999)
as if it were a new scientific discovery, instead of just the plain
truth that there are problems you can't solve despite massive effort and money. (Cynics: The
"futility movement" coincided with changes in reimbursement plans for physicians and hospitals
which meant that they would lose, rather than make, money when families insisted on "doing
everything" for their dying loved one....) We even hear about something "beyond futility", i.e.,
disability and death with dignity (JAMA 287: 2253, 2002) and comfort.
FINAL NOTE
Pathology is the scientific knowledge that will enable you to find and treat disease effectively. Don't
be discouraged! There's plenty you can do!-- ERF
-- Hippocrates
-- Paul (I Th 5:12)
smokers and those who must breathe
polluted air.
emphysema/chronic bronchitis
Buerger's thromboangiitis obliterans (only rare one on the list)
esophageal cancer
larynx cancer
bladder cancer
gum disease
kidney cancer
pancreas cancer
upset stomach and peptic ulcer
household fires
cellulitis
strep
throats
bacterial conjunctivitis
bacterial ear infections
impetigo
food poisoning (especially staphylococcal
)
bacterial diarrheas ("Montezuma's revenge", etc.)
gonorrhea (one million cases yearly; 300,000 hospitalizations)
,
and mycoplasmal diseases
viral and mycoplasmal chest colds
viral and chlamydial
conjunctivitis
viral and mycoplasmal ear infections
viral gastroenteritis
infectious mononucleosis
herpes zoster infections (chickenpox, shingles)
herpes simplex I
(lip) and II
(genitals)
cytomegalic inclusion disease (cytomegalovirus infection)
chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis
fungal infections of the nails
"subclinical" histoplasmosis
"subclinical" toxoplasmosis
lice ("pediculosis")
knee injuries
varicoceles
sports injuries
inguinal hernias
impotence
premature ejaculation
male pattern baldness (bothers some men, doesn't bother others, some men like it)
homosexuality As always, this is
extremely politicized; right or wrong,
"ego-dystonic" gay men are not the only people nowadays
who seek to become more comfortable with a range of sexual
expressions
transvestism ("cross-dressing")
Again, hard to justify as a "disease" though some men may wish to be
rid of the compulsion
benign prostatic enlargement
microscopic cancers of the prostate
menstrual iron deficiency anemia
frigidity
menstrual cramps
vaginal infections (candida
, trichomonas, gardnerella)
bacterial urinary bladder and kidney infections
atypias of the cervical epithelium
leiomyomas ("fibroids") of the uterus
endometriosis
vomiting of pregnancy
pre-eclampsia
miscarriages
cystoceles
menopausal hot flashes
kraurosis of the vulva
idiopathic hirsutism
acne
atopic dermatitis ("eczema")
seborrheic dermatitis (dandruff, "oily skin", etc.)
contact dermatitis
drug rashes
miliaria ("prickly heat", "jungle rot", etc.)
warts
seborrheic keratoses
tinea versicolor and ringworm
capillary hemangiomas
dermatofibromas
pigmented nevi ("moles")
lentigos ("moles", "liver spots", etc.)
epidermoid inclusion cysts ("sebaceous cysts")
sun-damaged skin
actinic keratoses
patent foramen ovale (usually a trivial autopsy finding)
varicose veins
gum disease
aphthous stomatitis ("canker sores")
reflux peptic esophagitis
hiatus hernias
peptic ulcers of stomach and duodenum
diverticular disease of the colon
functional bowel disease ("spastic colon")
hemorrhoid problems
Gilbert's "disease" (problems conjugating bilirubin)
gallstones
respiratory allergies ("hay fever", asthma)
poison ivy
refractive errors, astigmatism
presbyopia
cataracts
conjunctivitis
impacted earwax
otitis externa
presbycusis
serous otitis
otosclerosis
mild perceptual and learning problems
bursitis
tendinitis
sprains
fractures
ingrown toenails
bunions
"subclinical" folic acid deficiency (major problem, long-neglected)
iron deficiency
"subclinical" iron overload
(??) "functional hypoglycemia" ("idiopathic post-prandial syndrome")
(??) "subclinical" zinc deficiency
(about 400,000 deaths worldwide each year, almost entirely
in countries where they do not immunize: Int. J. Inf. Dis. 4: 14, 2000)
(still a terrible problem: Bulletin of WHO 76: 161, 1998;
there are an estimated 277,000 deaths worldwide each year)
,
famine, trauma, and obstetrical
catastrophes.
Cancer and gout probably followed. Mosquito-borne diseases have also been very important in
warmer regions.
,
streptococcus
)
were major killers. They produce a
variety of illnesses.
killed 1 person in 5 or even more in the centuries after its introduction, and caused chronic
severe pain and/or insanity in many more. Today it is easily cured using antibiotics.
("black death") killed half the people in Europe and Asia every few centuries. Now
it is easy to cure.
,
a rickettsial disease transmitted by lice, was another highly fatal epidemic disease,
especially during wartime. Cholera was yet another major epidemic killer, especially during the
1800's.
,
caused by a virus, was another dread epidemic disease. Death is usually due to bacterial
superinfection of the damaged lungs.
Measles
Mumps
Pertussis ("whooping cough")
Rubella ("German measles")
Poliomyelitis
Smallpox (thought to be extinct today)
Tetanus
Appendicitis
Berry aneurysms
Benign ovarian tumors
Bleeding peptic ulcers
Cardiac valvular problems
Congenital heart diseases
Dissecting aneurysm
Diverticulitis
Ectopic pregnancies
Gallstones
GI malformations
Intussusception of the bowel
Kidney stones
Obstetrical problems
Strangulated hernias
Volvulus
(2) Cigaret smoking
(3) High blood pressure
(4) Diabetes mellitus (less important than any of the first three factors)
(5) Lack of exercise (less important than any of the first four factors)
(6) Hereditary differences in the lipoprotein molecules and their receptors,
homocysteine metabolism, and the coagulation
proteins. Some of these are very important, and are being sorted out.
(7) Obesity? stress? (Whether these are independent risk factors is unclear. You will have to decide
for yourself!)
Ages 20-39:
Males:
Females:
(1) Accidents (around 6000 / year)
murder...
1 in 300
house fire...
1 in 800
firearm accident...
1 in 2500
electrocution...
1 in 5000
passenger plane crash...
1 in 20,000
flood...
1 in 30,000
tornado...
1 in 60,000
fireworks...
1 in 1 million
botulism
...
1 in 3 million
asteroid or comet impact with earth...
1 in 3000 to
1 in 250,000
LIFESTYLE-RELATED DISEASES:
The suicide rate among black men in the US is also far lower
than among white men. For a review, see Lancet 351: 934, 1998.
The commonest chromosomal syndromes are Klinefelter's (XXY; 1/850) and Down's syndromes
(trisomy 21; maybe 1/1000). Turner's (XO) and "supermale" (
XYY,
a curious subject) are slightly less common.
TWAR, the asthma bug(?)
Primary care is the pinnacle of medical practice because
the physician must constantly be asking, "What is the WORST TREATABLE
thing this COULD POSSIBLY be?" Then the physician must rule this out (or in).
(you won't get another chance...)
![]()
![]()
Porphyrias and other inborn errors of metabolism have few or no anatomic changes, and we will
discuss these only briefly.
,
herpes simplex I
,
Lyme disease
, HIV)
,
cytomegalovirus
"mono")
("general paralysis of the insane") and perhaps
Lyme disease
"A court of law is not a good place to try to get at the truth."
Certain "cult" diagnoses have had a devastating impact
on both their "victims" and those around them.
People with emotional problems typically feel chronically unwell.
(The mainstay of therapy is to learn new living skills to replace those
that were once required to survive in an abusive home.)
However, once such a person self-diagnoses or is diagnosed as having
a "cult" diagnosis, he/she gains "victim" status, will make absurd
demands on others, and will get
sicker and sicker.
),
Arch. Int. Med. 159: 2430, 1999 (genital herpes
),
Cancer 77: 1089, 1996 and
Cancer 79: 105, 1996 and Br. Med. J. 304: 1078, 1992 and
Br. Med. J. 319: 1027,1999
(breast cancer);
Arch. Gen. Psych. 49: 396, 1992 and Am.
J. Psych. 148: 733, 1991 (AIDS);
Am. J. Card. 68: 1171, 1991 (coronary disease); Ann. Int. Med.
114: 381, 1991 and Gut 31: 179, 1990
inflammatory bowel disease).
The one exception is multiple sclerosis, where a relationship
has long been clear (Br. Med. J. 327: 646, 2003).
Also discredited
is the old "holistic" claim that serious disease and
death are more likely after bereavement and so forth (J. Behav. Med. 13: 263, 1990).
By the mid-1990's serious researched had stopped even looking at this stuff.
Welcome to the introductory Pathology course. Most of you are undergraduate medical students. In this course you will learn the essential facts about human disease, so that you will be able to practice honest medicine.
Ideas about disease have changed during human history. People have thought about sickness as magical and mysterious, as abnormalities of whole persons, as abnormalities of individual organs, as abnormalities of cells, and as abnormalities of molecules.
Primitive people believe diseases are caused by gods and spirits. Diseases occur because people sin beyond the community standards, break taboos, or are bewitched. Primitive people treat diseases by praying, confessing their sins, and acting out magical ceremonies. In many cultures, the patient must show unquestioning faith, or the gods will be displeased and the patient will suffer. Most cultures also have some naturalistic ideas about disease. So primitive people also treat sick people by putting things into any and all body orifices, or even by creating new body orifices.
The ancient Egyptians made around 700,000,000 mummies. They took the organs out of the dead people and preserved them. Oddly, we have no record that Egyptian doctors ever examined their former patients' insides. They made some notes on practical therapeutics, but most of the surviving Egyptian medical literature is occult nonsense. One evil spirit is called "Mr. Pus-Friend, Cancer-Brother", etc.
The ancient Greek medical texts never mention supernatural causes of disease. The ancient Greeks had no concept of the real mechanics of disease, beyond observations of wounds, tumors, "swellings", etc. The best-known physician of ancient Greece was Dr. Hippocrates (460-377 BC). He and his students believed all diseases were processes that involved entire persons. Dr. Hippocrates sometimes tried to explain disease in terms of the traditional doctrine of four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile.) Disease is caused by imbalances of the four humors ("bad blendings," "dyscrasias") within the whole person. Disease was never localized to one part of the body. All this was wrong, but Dr. Hippocrates was no dogmatizer and the "four humors" myth probably did his patients no harm.
Dr. Hippocrates was really an empiricist. He taught his students to carefully observe patients and
watch what happened to them as they were treated. Dr. Hippocrates proved that sick people can be
examined, their diseases classified, a diagnosis made for each, a prognosis established, and the
patient treated intelligently. Although the Greeks understood almost nothing about real disease
processes, they did discover what treatments helped for different patients. But except for minor
surgery, they had no specific remedies for specific diseases. The Greeks cured almost nobody.
Dr. Hippocrates is most famous for institutionalizing the high ideals of medical ethics. The
Hippocratic oath made medicine a sacred calling rather than just a way of making a living.
Hippocrates emphasized that some diseases are not treatable and that it is a credit to the physician to
be candid about this. Two Alexandrian physicians did autopsies.
Dr. Herophilus (335-280 BC) to do the first descriptions
of cadaver dissection, and Dr. Eristratos (310-250) to correlate organ changes with diseases
(ascites with cirrhosis, etc.)
Their work had no real impact on the
understanding of disease.
They tried to correlate their findings with the clinical pictures with some
success, but they had no influence on prevailing dogmas.
Dr. Cornelius Celsus (first century AD) described medical practice in his time in De Medicina. This
book includes descriptions of heart disease and mental illness, and the four classic signs of
inflammation. Dr. Claudius Galen (130-200 AD), another Roman, began his career as the
government physician to the gladiators. A careful observer, Dr. Galen soon became a famous
physician, writer and lecturer. He discovered and explained several anatomic structures, including
the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which he named "Galen's nerve." He wrote up some amazing
experiments he did on living animals, and he published long lists of the rich and famous people who
attended his lectures.
Dr. Galen dissected Barbary monkeys instead of humans. His mistakes included the five-lobed
human liver, the two common bile ducts, and the holes where the blood goes through the septum of
the heart. Dr. Galen's work remained the absolute authority until time of Dr. Vesalius. At anatomy
demonstrations in the middle ages, the learned anatomy professor read out loud from Galen while
the lowly morgue attendant cut on the body. If the morgue attendant found something that was not
in "Galen", the professor ignored it. So there was exactly no progress in anatomy or anatomic
pathology.
Dr. Celsus and Dr. Galen knew how inflammation and cancer looked and acted, and they
emphasized patterns of symptoms and signs. For lack of any better theory of pathology, both these
Roman doctors subscribed to the "four humors" idea of Dr. Hippocrates. Dr. Galen was also an
amateur pagan philosopher and some of these writings survive too. He respected his Jewish and
Christian neighbors, and was opposed to the persecutions. Like Dr. Hippocrates, Dr. Celsus and
Dr. Galen had no concept of organ pathology, and they probably cured nobody.
Neither Dr. Hippocrates nor Dr. Galen ever did an autopsy (at least lawfully).
Ancient and medieval superstition
prohibited opening a dead body. Pathologic anatomy was limited to observing war wounds, bone
injuries, skin diseases and a few clinical signs.
In the middle ages, the Moslem world
produced the best physicians. They were excellent observers of the living, but did not do autopsies.
It took special permission from the pope to allow Dr. Mondino de Luzzi to perform an autopsy in front of an
audience; this took place in Bologna in 1316.
The autopsy (necropsy, post-mortem exam, "post") became popular only after Dr. Vesalius's
anatomic work (1543). People realized that they could learn about the world by observing it,
instead of reading old books.
When autopsies became legal, early investigators made many discoveries
that offered new
understandings of old diseases, but nobody understood essential diseases processes. As Dr. Galen
and humoralism lost popularity, new fad theories emerged to explain all disease. In countries where
it was legal to teach the existence of atoms, methodist physicians attributed all disease to changes in
distances between atoms. In countries where atomic theory was still banned for ideological
reasons (too unspiritual), pneumatist (vitalist)
physicians blamed disease on the spiritual forces that controlled physiologic processes.
All previous anatomic pathology was superseded in 1761 by Dr. John Morgagni, an Italian. He
called his charming series of 700 autopsies The Seats and Causes of Disease, Investigated by Anatomy. Written at age 78,
it summed up a lifetime's experience and is still a great read.
On the evidence, Dr. Morgagni was a genuinely good human being and was among
the most beloved people of his era.
Thanks to his work, all disease was now recognized as
disease of organs, and disease "sat" in different organs in different patients.
Dr. Morgagni
meticulously related his patients' symptoms to their diseased organs, making the first
clinico-pathologic correlations. This was real progress, but
Dr. Morgagni had no real idea of how disease in one organ caused malfunction in another organ, or
even what disease is.
Since every major organ has one vein, Dr. Morgagni's students developed the
next fad theory. All disease was due to phlebitis, inflammation of the vein draining the organ.
Dr. Karl Rokitansky of Vienna was the next great autopsy pathologist. He wrote the Handbook of
General Pathologic Anatomy (1846), and in his day was the world's most famous pathologist.
Vienna law decreed that everybody who died got autopsied by him. He did over 30,000 autopsies
personally. Dr. Rokitansky was a colleague of Dr. Joseph Skoda, the world's most famous clinical
diagnostician. In the morning, Dr. Skoda taught all the Viennese medical students on the wards and
tried to make diagnoses on the patients who were still alive. In the afternoon, everybody went
downstairs to see Dr. Rokitansky's autopsies on the dead patients and find out whether Dr. Skoda
had been right. Thus, Dr. Rokitansky performed the most important function of the medical
pathologist, relating clinical signs and symptoms to pathologic anatomy, and correlating function
and structure. The medical students handled all the fresh organs without gloves and then go deliver
babies without washing their hands. This was unhealthy, but it continued until a young instructor
named Dr. Ignatius Semmelweiss introduced mandatory hand-washing. But that's another story.
Dr. Rokitansky and Dr. Skoda agreed that the medical therapeutics of their era had little to offer.
(They were right.) Dr. Skoda's motto was "Forget treatment, the diagnosis is everything". They
called this approach therapeutic nihilism. Dr. Skoda the clinician and Dr. Rokitansky the
pathologist were brilliant, but nobody really had any idea what caused most disease. They didn't
even know about germs. Dr. Rokitansky came up with a theory to explain all disease as crasias and
dyscrasias. These caused the non-cellular ground substance to produce new defective cells.
During the German revolution of 1848, there was a bad
typhus
Hippocrates
NIH photo
Galen
NIH photo
Morgagni
NIH photo
Semmelweiss
NIH photo
Skoda
NIH photo
Dr. Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) is the greatest pathologist of all time. Dr. Virchow was a
German, a tiny man but one of medicine's giants.
Dr. Virchow started as a junior autopsy pathologist working
for the German government at the University of Berlin. He liked to cut thin sections of diseased
tissues with a razor, and look at them using the latest technology, the microscope. Dr. Virchow first
achieved renown by discovering leukemia and myelin.
epidemic. The government sent
Dr. Virchow to find out what caused typhus. After investigating, he announced that typhus was
caused